The Unveiling

'Holy' geometry from my point of view is more like 'defining' geometry, something which actually exists before geometry was created. Much like nature or 'God' is ever creative and evolving in forms measures and arrangement. Whereas sacred geometry to me is more like having to study all laws of all countries of the world or the TOCs of all products of all companies of the world. Just to with that knowledge then apply something to a 'structure' of any kind which nature does more or less 'automatically' (naturally) and with ease - rendering sacred geometry and its proclaimed 'power' (research on this if you like) pretty much worthless in the end compared to where it was 'copied' from. And I guess studying all those natural 'laws' was not even fun for those who are into sacred geometry. Not that I would discredit humanity for its steady endeavour to get closer to nature or 'natural laws' but seeing where humanity

Let's just as a premise imagine there was a 'one' world order plan of something like transhumanism - some people might have heard about this in form of abstruse conspiracy theories - which I personally never believed in. Short description of what the transhumanism theory is about: People living on earth get technological 'implants', which enhance their experience of 'reality' - updates to their life one could say The proposers are 'people' who later on control the reality of the people who agreed to this update - according to the promises agreed in a kind of contract Children might or might not automatically join the contract according to what was agreed on (compare to the idea of 'original sin') Sounds great at first, playing life as a kind of computer game but rather horrible if you think of possible consequences - especially if people who get you into their 'game' turn out to be not as benevolent and interested in the good

Thesis: Every expression in any kind of language (as a method of communication between two or more conscious beings) -is- suggestion. If any being tries to or communicates with you, all it actually does is suggesting you something (maybe it is telling you part of its perceived reality or something it wants you to know or to believe). You have been trained in school and/or in the society you live in to associate certain informational chunks like words, ideas, etc. with your intellect. In the western world, if somebody tells you "don't think of a pink elephant" he/she/it actually suggests you to think of a pink elephant and will succeed with that for most people. Even worse, you might even have a notion of the pink elephant popping up in your imagination immediately. If you meet someone who is immune to thinking of the pink elephant he/she/it certainly had a very special training in deprogramming the common intellectual fundament and you should probably marry him/her/it